The moon landings (hoaxed): February 2009

There are several arguments that involve radiation in deep space. They are about: The Van Allen Radiation Belts, the re- entry and the moon's harshly powerful surface.

The VAN ALLEN RADIATION BELTS would have killed the astronauts

The radiation belts were first discovered by James Van Allen.The Van Allen Radiation Belts are great amounts radiation belts trapped inside the earth's magnetic field. Some say that the astronauts could not have survived them. Others say they were well protected enough that they could get past the radiation belts and the re- entry.

How this works:

The Van Allen Radiation Belts are high amounts of radiation trapped in the earth's magnetic field outside of the earth's atmosphere. The radiation comes from the sun. The magnetic field is able to trap some of it in two belts outside the earth's atmosphere. How? In that area, there is no atmosphere. The atmosphere protects the life on earth from lethal radiation. The earth's atmosphere consists of cold air, which has less energy than hot air, so the hot air rises and the cold air sinks. Eventually, the hot air leaves the atmosphere. Without an atmosphere, it takes longer for the hot air to leave and the heat from the sun comes a lot faster. When heat goes to something quicker than it leaves it, how hot the object is starts to increase. Now, the moon's surface is over 250 degrees during the day. This means the sun's energy heats up something over twice as much if it has no atmosphere. Obviously,the heat would leave more than twice as slowly. So the Van Allen Radiation Belts would have been getting stronger for every moment, for the thousands of years the earth has existed, until they reached reached their limit, which would have extremely high radioactivity.

So, how do we know the Van Allen Radiation Belts would have reached an extreme amount of power already? How powerful is their radioactivity and how do we know? To find that out, we would have to know the three main places from where they come from. First, the main place is obviously every day energy from the sun. Sometimes, a solar flare occurs and the sun sends out storms that fortunately, for us, don't get past the magnetic field, but some of the energy is trapped in our magnetic field. The third energy source of the Van Allen Radiation Belts that we know of is Galactic Cosmic Radiation. Though we don't know how often our solar system is attacked by cosmic radiation, solar flares usually happen once every 11 years. The earth is around 10,000 years old. That's obviously long enough, even if regular heat from the sun was the Van Allen Radiation Belt's only source. How hot is it? We may never know exactly.

Are the Van Allen Radiation Belts as powerful as a powerful solar flare? Could the earth's gravity hold such a tremendous amount of radiation? The answer is yes. It has to be able to. The magnetic protects the earth during solar flares by collecting energy in the Van Allen Radiation Belts, shielding the earth's atmosphere of most of the heat and the only thing it does to the earth's atmosphere is let us see a lunar eclipse. An amount of monstrous energy we are spared from is kept in the part of our magnetic field right outside the earth's atmosphere. See, some of the heat coming to the earth is completely blocked, and the part outside is collected. Without that system, we would all die out. It's hard to believe that there is a part of the earth's magnetic field that mostly blocks a solar flare, a part that somewhat collects it and no part in between that completely collects it. Explorer 1, 3, 4, Pioneer 3, Sputnik 3 and Luna 1 seemingly only got close to the Van Allen Belts, not into them. Even if they could, a human couldn't.

There are also different beliefs of what kind of radiation the Van Allen Radiation Belts are made out of. First of all, how powerful the radioactivity is in an area depends not only on what kind of radiation it is, but also on how much radiation is trapped in the area. Secondly, since the Van Allen Radiation Belts get their energy partly from Solar flares, it should have the same types of radiation. Solar flares can produce gamma rays, radio waves X rays and UV radiation. They obviously include both fission and fusion. The Van Allen Radiation Belt is like an extremely powerful series of nuclear bombs going off all the time.

But does this mean that they couldn't pass it? James Van Allen himself believes the protection the astronauts had were powerful enough for the to survive the belts. But the protection the astronauts had was a paper- thin layer of aluminum around the spacecraft, the armor of the rocket, armor on their suits, fibers in their suits and a cooling system in their suits. If that is enough protection, NASA should see if they can re- test it by placing the rocket in a 4,000 degree area with lethal amounts of radiation and then leave it there for about 45 minutes- that's around how long it took for them to get past the Van Allen Radiation Belts. But off course, NASA is not going to do that anytime soon. And aluminum hull reduces energy from radiation only by around 75% if there is enough aluminum for the speed, intensity and amount of the radiation it's trying to resist. The aluminum hull was just paper- thin.

If the radiation couldn't kill the astronauts by over heating the area where they were or melting the material of the rocket, the radiation would have sent way more than a spark to the fuel of the engine and the oxygen tank. That should have blown up the rocket.

Even if the radiation belts couldn't kill the astronauts, or hurt them, they still prove the moon landing a hoax because it would have disrupted the communications and because NASA claims the astronauts only picked up one rem of radiation the entire trip. A rem is only 1/25 of what it takes to give someone radiation poisoning. If anyone went to the moon, they would know better than that. The Van Allen Radiation Belts are completely indisputable evidence of Apollo mission fraud.

The MOON'S DEADLY SURFACE and the supposed Apollo "moon landings."

The moon is not like the earth. The earth has a highly humid atmosphere. Without it, we could not survive. That's what the moon is like. It's supposedly 200+ degrees during the day and 200- degrees during the night. We aren't sure that NASA's suits would be able to survive that. Moon landing hoax theorists are wanting a test on the suits that proves that ability, but NASA hasn't. Instead, NASA claims the astronauts landed during the early morning of the moon which lasts longer because the moon spins a whole circle every 27 days.

But if the astronauts were able to survive the moon's surface, what about the American flag and the feather Neil Armstrong used in his experiment? They weren't the least bit protected. In fact, the flag was waving in some of the clips. If the astronauts needed suits to protect themselves from the heat, then the bare flag and the bare feather would be burned up easily. Some say that's impossible because of the fact that there is no oxygen on the moon. But they are only part right. The fact that there is no oxygen on the moon is only proof that the flags and other heat- vulnerable objects wouldn't catch on fire. It's like how it is with the sun. The sun isn't on fire, but it still has the amount of radiation it takes to totally destroy things.

The RE- ENTRY INTO THE EARTH'S MAGNETIC FIELD would of killed or hurt the astronauts.

Coming back to the earth and surviving would have been a very hard part of the trip. They came from outside of the earth's magnetic field to inside the earth's atmosphere, unlike any other man- space mission.

The astronauts had to go from space through the magnetic field, and then from the magnetic field into the earth's atmosphere. This would have probably have doubled or added to the friction by around 50%. The method NASA used was they came into the magnetic field, bounced of the earth's atmosphere and then re- entered. That probably wasn't enough.

Suspicious political events and deaths involving NASA's Apollo project:

> Guss Grimson, Edd White, Roger Chaffee were all killed in an Apollo 1 fire inside the rocket they were locked in. They say they heard Guss Grimson, Edd White and Roger Chaffee yelling about the fire before they died. But before the fire, the capsule's communication systems failed. Grimson tried to commumicate, saying: "No, I didn't read you Chuck at all. I can't read you Chuck. You wanna try the phone? How are we going to get to the moon when we can't talk between two buildings? I can't hear a word you're saying." It's as if while others knew there was a moon landing hoax being planned, they didn't and people knew that if they were killed by the radiation, more people would suspect the future moon landings were hoaxed and they would have more proof behind them. Guss Grimson's family claims the death's were no accident, but on purpose. They say nasa knows who it was and they need to tell them the truth. Before the rocket was even finished, people in the North American Aviation were in arguements with NASA of how the rocket should be designed. Before lift- off, the crew showed deep concern about fire hazards. After the believed "accident," the North American Aviation was partly blamed for the deaths of the astronatus. It seems that someone intended for the rocket to be deadly.
See: www.youtube.com/watch?v=V0W9bQ2Jg3A. Some of NASA admits that it was carelesness and that no one thought about whether or not a fire could start in the ground. Right after a phraze procaliming that, however, it was said: "-Let's go to the moon."

> Thomas Ronald Baron was a safety inspector during Apollo 1. After the incident in which several astronauts died, he approached Congress saying the US. may never walk the moon. Exactly one week after his approach, he and most of his family were killed. It was said to be a train accident. But why would it just happen to be a train accident killing a safety inspector of a failed "moon mission" and most of his family a week after he testified against the Apollo project?

> John F Kennedy was President while nasa was planning on going to the moon and he was putting hard effort into supporting them. But during his Presidency, he was murdered. It could have been parts of nasa trying to pressure people into helping them and believing in them through a tragic death. Maybe they thought John F. Kennedy was putting too much effort into it himself and that he might find out the truth. Although Johnson, his Vice President who became President, also put a "risky" amount of effort into it, the secret service had recently been invented and he was expected to have faith in NASA as part of his sadness for John F. Kennedy. Both of those ideas seemed to be true. Johnson didn't believe in NASA's hoax and no President in America has been assassinated since the secret service was invented that we know of.

> Richard Nixon was President while the first moon landing was said to occur. But his glory didn't last too long. Nixon turned out to be a cheater. He literally, after being caught, asked if he could retire from his Presidency. Like Kennedy, his Presidency ended suspiciously.

What likely happened to John F. Kennedy was he was assassinated because some of NASA was afraid that unless they could pressure the people to have faith in them through a devastating death, someone would end up discovering the fraud while they were trying to help with the Apollo project. If they were thinking that way, they were probably right. Few people in America believed in the hoax and then said so years after Apollo 18 and then generations after that were sometimes pressured into not even questioning the Apollo project. At first, it was probably partly because of the Kennedy assasination. Now, it's because people are trying to pressure the people younger than them into having faith in the Apollo project because they are afraid to question supposed "heroes" who were claimed to have went to the moon and come back.

Most of NASA was trying to put man on the moon. But some of them were planning a hoax, because they feared the radiation in deep space. They knew they could not survive the heat and radiation on the trip. But Guss Grimson actually was trying to get to the moon. The hoax planners inside NASA didn't want him to die before the trip was halfway over. That would rise suspicion. So, Grimson's death was something they were picky about. Frauds were also inside the North American Aviation and put traps inside the rocket. This may be what Baron had interpretated. It seems he thought that someone inside wanted to fake it. Because whatever Barren said, it seems Baron was dead for a particalarly big reason. 10 astronauts died in freak accidents, sometimes during their own training. Could this be because NASA was hiding their vulnerability to the dangers of deep space? It's obviously the truth. No astronaut has died or suffered from an accident in outer space, yet there were several astronauts who died in suspicious and freak accidents based on technichal difficulties that occured on earth? Why would that be? Some scientists of the time of the Apollo project were shocked and angry at NASA for continuing the Apollo project even after all of those astronauts died suspiciously. Could it bee that the reason NASA's concience was so still against some of the scientist's opinions because there was more than one reason not to believe them? Yes, it was.

Barren was claimed to be killed by a train in an complete accident. It was exactly one week after his testimony and a rare death that was unlikely to happen to anyone. Someone could have easily killed them with hand in hand combat that didn't involve guns, then put his car on the tracks ,with him and his family inside it, hijack the train, destroy Barren's car, and then give the train back to the original driver and forcing him not to say a word. Or, maybe the train owner himself was trying to help the murderers cover- up for their crime.

President John F. Kennedy's death was selected at just the right time so that people would think he died because of his speeches he made against slavery.

Richard Nixon was President while NASA was said to send man to the moon. But later, he turned out to be a cheater and he retired from Presidency. Although he is clearly not the only President who cheated, he is the only one that asked to be dismissed. He clearly was hiding something. Nixon was John F. Kennedy's old opponent during the election that John F. Kennedy won. This sounds like no coincidence. The probability is that Nixon was cheating along with the hoax parts of NASA so that people would trust him more. But after he was caught, he was forced to admit his cheating against the opinions he was against. He asked to leave his Presidency behind him probably for more than one reason. The probabilities are that:

> All of his effort to gain worthless trust had only lead him to success for so long. His depression was either more than he could take or more than what he would take.

> If he was caught and kept going as President, more and more suspicion would rise both on him and NASA. He had made deals with the hoax parts of NASA and was afraid of their betrayal.

> Some of the hoax planners inside NASA were wanting a more trusted President.

> He feared he might be assassinated, like his old opponent, John F. Kennedy. The secret service might have a harder time putting the effort into protecting him that they were supposed too. He thought his protection at the White House wasn't enough and he was more comfortable having no strong protection if people felt less reason to assassinate him.

> He thought he would have a better reputation if he quit and pretended it was for the people's own good, that he wasn't able to be President.

The theory that NASA terminated the astronauts who were trying to go to the moon, while others helped pull off a giant hoax has some sense behind it. The astronauts in the the Apollo project who died all died on the earth but the ones who were claimed to go into space all survived, even though Apollo 13 was said to have a dangerous accident that got close to killing 3 astronauts. So, it's easier to survive in space than to avoid a freak accident on earth? No. There was obviously something wrong with the moon landings.

The most suspicious is probably the cold war and the events of the space race that was in it.

Americans and Russians were on a race to the moon, determined that whoever won the race would be known as the world dominator. When Russia sent sputnick, the first satellite into inner space, the Americans were terrified. Some even thought we might be headed for extinction because of Nuclear bombs. Assumptions were being made that Russia was going to drop Nuclear bombs on America from space. Meanwhile, America was having trouble sending rockets high above the ground. Suspicious deaths and technical difficulties were NASA's big problems. According to those who believe in the moon landings, in three years, America went from where they were to a time when they weren't able to get far of the ground to a time when they could go to the moon in 2 years and then Russia who three years before then, was in the lead, didn't go to the moon for 40 years after America's supposed "moon landing." This exchange was extremely unlikely at the time and it still seems suspicious.

Russians, supposedly using spy sattelites accuse America of hiding a studio in "area 51," a place at the Vedas high desert, which is so heavily guarded, that if you went in, on purpose for any reason, or on accident, or even if you were mentally ill, you could be shot and murdered. The government says it's where some military flight and bomb testing, training and practicing occurs. But what part of the government is definitely going to be honest about a place that they'd guard with innocent people's lives? Why would there be 80,000 guards and none betray this murderous way of secrecy? Were the guards divided, not only into different parts, but into different intentions? Probably so. There has been reported betrayel in American surges in other countries, so shouldn't there be betrayel in area 51? Either their hiding truths about betrayel, or the guards are devided into different intentions.

The summarary is simple yet, curious:
John F. Kennedy was assasinated, a cheater took over after 8 years, 10 astronauts die in suspicious deaths, along with Thomas Ronald Barren, who feared the program could be stopped dead in its tracks, and it all happened in a space race in the Cold War, a result of American and Russian paronia of each other, while area 51 was and still is suspiciously and horrificly unreasonably protected and hidden. Coincidence? Why shouldn't anyone doubt it? Something was wrong. The government was untrusworthy. So, they were obviously hiding something big. The one theory with photography, video footage and other strong evidence behind it is the moon landing being faked. The suspicious deaths and political events show the government could very well be hiding something. The photographic evidence, the video evidence, the radiation in deep space and the dissability to re- enter the earth's atmosphere are all proof that the government was hiding something and they show exactly what it was that they were hiding.

Engine noise from a rocket and the lift off.

The engine noise in a rocket is over 200 dB(A). That's loud enough to kill someone in close range if they weren't shielded. Where the astronauts were was a location feet from the engine. And NASA's designing for a sound system that could hear through all of that noise was innacurate. The microphones being inside the spacesuits and the walls being between the engine are the only parts of the sound system made to allow the astronaut's voices to be heard through all of that noise. That's not enough to keep engine noise powerful enough to kill anyone up close.

The moon landings (hoaxed)

The Van Allen Belts, the re- entry and the lunar surface

Related websites:

Followers

Suspicious political events and deaths involving NASA's Apollo project:

Engine noise from a rocket and the lift off.

Other links

Questions or comments?